Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

After seeing Oliver Stone’s latest film last week, Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, I chose not to review it, partly because I’m not sure how much my boss really wants to pay me to write about movies, but perhaps more importantly, at least for me, because I wasn’t really sure how to articulate my thoughts on it…that is until I saw The Social Network.

Now doing a review of a film by comparing it to a film it is completely unrelated to may not generally be the best way to review a film…but it seems to work here, so I plan to go with it.  (And those who read my review of The Social Network should have some idea of where I am headed with this.)

(Spoiler Alerts)

Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps tells the story of Wall Street Wonder boy Jake Moore, played by Shia LaBeouf, who may be a secret environmentalist crusader, or perhaps just an ambitious young man looking to invest in the next big thing…in the case of this film, fusion technologies. His mom, played by Susan Sarandon, is a nurse turned real-estate agent, coping with a changing real-estate market and the bleak possibility that she may have to return to the middle class. His girlfriend, Winnie Gekko, played by Carey Mulligan, is a young blogger trying to change the world through a hipper version of The Huffington Post. Also, Winnie is the daughter of Gordon Gekko, who Jake secretly becomes the protégé of, against Winnie’s wishes, once his long time mentor Louis Zabel, played by Frank Langella, commits suicide after his company is ruined. Through Gordon Gekko, Jake learns that the man responsible for the downfall of Zabel’s company is Josh Brolin’s cartooinshly evil, motorcycle racing, capitalist, Bretton James, who, as the film progresses, is shown as being at least partially responsible for the United State’s recent economic downturn, as well as Gordon Gekko’s incarceration.

In an effort to be relevant, Wall Street:  Money Never Sleeps checks practically every liberal box of the last decade: capitalism is bad, the recession, the housing market, environmentalism and alternative energies, oil companies and investors suppressing the growth of such industries, and liberal blogging. But in a formulaic film with practically every character representing one or more of these positions, the film comes off as trying too hard. It feels as if a high school kid was given a prompt from his creative writing teacher to incorporate each of these ideas into a story. Although still entertaining enough, the result isn’t relevance but an amateurish attempt at it.

Now compare that to The Social Network from which relevance seems to effortlessly flow as it subtly captures a unique time and place in recent history.

Advertisements

There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: